What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

a b i 1 x []

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

What makes you think that former U.S. President Donald Trump's legal team has already been laying the groundwork for an appeal in the hush money trial?

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

6 Foods You Should Eat More of After 60, According to Dietitians - EatingWell

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro ‘Embrace The Challenge’ Update June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

in structures, such as:

How Trump broke the politics of Medicaid - Politico

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

+ for